|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruday and Duran
(1975) compared the TETD/TA and TFM. As part of this work, data obtained by using
the TFM on a group of applications considered representative were then used to
generate cooling load temperature differential (CLTD) data, for direct one-step
calculation of cooling load from conduction heat gain through sunlit walls and
roofs and conduction through glass exposure. Cooling load factors (CLF) for similar
one-step calculation of solar through glass and for loads from internal sources
were also developed. More recent research (McQuiston 1992) developed an improved
factor for solar load through glass, the solar cooling load (SCL) factor, which
allows additional influencing parameters to be considered for greater accuracy.
CLTDs, SLFs, and CLFs all include the effect of (1) time lag in conductive heat
gain through opaque exterior surfaces and (2) time delay by thermal storage in
converting radiant heat gain to cooling load. This simplification allows cooling
loads to be calculated manually; thus, when data are available and are appropriately
used, the results are consistent with those from the TFM, thus making the method
popular for instruction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CLTD and
CLF tables published in previous editions of the Fundamental volume and in the
original Cooling and Heating Load Calculation Manual (ASHRAE 1979) are normalized
data, based on applications of the original TFM data presented in the 1972 Fundamentals
volume. Subsequent studies investigating the effects of 1981 to 1985 RTF data
indicated results generally less conservative than those computed with the 1972
data. More recent research, however, suggests otherwise (McQuiston 1992), and
the revised values for 1993, including the new SCLs, are currently considered
more realistic for design load purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The originally
developed CLTD data were so voluminous that they were first limited to 13 representative
flat roof assemblies (with and without ceilings, for 26 total cases) and 7 wall
groups (into which 41 different wall assemblies can be categorized). Twenty-four
hourly CLTD values were tabulated for each of the 26 roof cases and each of the
7 wall groups, broken down for walls into 8 primary orientations. Adjustments
were then required for specific north latitude and month of calculation. Reliability
of adjustments was reasonably consistent during summer months but became much
less realistic for early and late hours during traditionally non-cooling load
months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solar heat
gain through glass required similar data compression to present a corresponding
range of conditions. Tables of maximum solar heat gain factors (SHGF) were listed
for every 4o
of north latitude between 0o and 64o, for each
month and by 16 compass directions and horizontal. Cooling load factors (CLF),
decimal multipliers for SHGF data, were tabulated for unshaded glass in spaces
having carpeted or uncarpeted floors and for inside-shaded glass with any room
construction. Unshaded CLFs were presented for each of 24 hours by 8 compass directions
plus horizontal, further categorized by light, medium, or heavy room construction.
Inside-shaded CLFs disregarded construction mass but included 16 orientations
plus horizontal. The product of the selected CLTD and CLF values represented cooling
load per unit area as a single process. CLF values published in the Handbook were
derived for the period May through September as normally the hottest months for
load calculation purposes. As with CLTDs, the reliability of CLF data deteriorated
rapidly for applications during early and late hours of months considered "noncooling
load" periods. |
|
|
|
|
|